login
login
Image header Agence Europe
Europe Daily Bulletin No. 12009
Contents Publication in full By article 13 / 37
SECTORAL POLICIES / Industry

UEAPME concerned by Parliament debates on revised definition of SMEs

The resolution submitted by Markus Pieper MEP (EPP, Germany) on the definition on SMEs is the subject of discussions at the European Parliament. The UEAPME, which represents the interests of SMEs at a European level, appears to be concerned about the content of some of the proposals, according to a paper seen by EUROPE on Wednesday 25 April.

Parliament's resolution reflects the public consultation launched by the European Parliament which is currently taking place (see EUROPE 11956).

The text as drafted by the rapporteur calls on the Commission to adapt the definition of SMEs in order to take into account increased inflation and productivity at work since 2003 (2003/61/EC recommendation).

The MEP also believes that the number of employees is not a criterion that should ensure a comparison throughout the Union and would prefer a turnover criterion for defining SMEs. Mr Pieper is also proposing a definition relating to mid-caps, businesses that escape the definition of SMEs but which maintain the same structure because this category is often used in European legislation, he argues. Parliament is requesting that the Commission carries out a feasibility study on the introduction of a definition for SMEs based on the different sectors.

All these proposals are causing the UEAPME some concern. It considers that although the Commission’s recommendations are 15 years old, they are still relevant and still cover 99.8% of businesses. There is therefore no reason to increase thresholds on the basis of inflation and productivity.

The organisation is also requesting that the number of employees remains the main criteria for defining SMEs and combining this criterium with turnover and balance sheet totals. The UEAPME is opposed to the introduction of a specific definition for mid cap businesses. It would prefer the Commission to take specific measures for these companies and not an initiative with another fund, as proposed by Mr Pieper. The UEAPME also ultimately rejects the specific sector by sector definition.

These proposals are also creating debate within the political groups. The industry, research and energy committee (ITRE) vote is planned for 15 May.  (Original version in French by Pascal Hansens)

Contents

SECTORAL POLICIES
EXTERNAL ACTION
SECURITY - DEFENCE
INSTITUTIONAL
ECONOMY - FINANCE - BUSINESS
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU
NEWS BRIEFS
CORRIGENDUM