A logic which escapes me. Is there anything in the arguments of the Constitution's opponents we've not heard before? I'm not talking about the "Sovereignists" or the Eurosceptics, whose opposition to the Constitution is entirely understandable and legitimate. They are against the "Community method", preferring the intergovernmental method (despite its ten centuries of failure), this is their right and this is what they will campaign for. I'm referring to those who are calling on the rest of...